🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."