🔗 Share this article

Following a significant legal reversal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the regulator to order platforms to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the footage and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with different editing might have met that threshold. As a result, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Opinion

A minority on the board disagreed, contending the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as that footage was released long after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Decision

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the decision.

"X fought this case to uphold free speech and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their own content policies.