🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. Last month, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.