🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or deny as they see fit. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that protests opposing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, primarily for carrying placards against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.